Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebekah Findlay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 21:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rebekah Findlay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still questionably enough as the 3 reviews are still questionably solid to help this article and the BBC coverage is only what remains, and even that is still questionably enough to save this. I should note I have searched and the best I found was this, this, my searches of the BBC have found nothing else. This was accepted in 2012 by Missvain. SwisterTwister talk 06:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nominator. I don't think the subject is notable: she has featured on some (local) BBC radio stations and the reviews really don't add anything to the article. I'd consider her to be notable if there were more evidence, but I can't find any. st170e^talk 18:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I would say fails WP:GNG. The BBC links don't add any information. The other sources are somewhat reliable (some of them seem self published) but not enough to pass GNG. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not pass WP:GNG. Tom29739 ^[talk] 19:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.